"Dummy Lyrics & Phonetic Songwriting"
by Richard Middleton
First published in Victory Review, March 2001.
I've found, both in my own songwriting and in working with my songwriting
students, that music often comes much more easily than lyrics. Bits of
melody pop into my mind all the time, and I can sometimes hear complete
arrangements, like I'm listening to a radio in my head. The thing
is, these newborn "songs" usually don't have any lyrics,
and it's often difficult to find the right words, that tell the right
story and fit the melody perfectly.
One time-honored method that songwriters use to begin putting words to
a finished piece of music is to write a "dummy lyric." A dummy
lyric is a temporary lyric (often silly, even nonsensical) that allows
you to outline a song's lyrical structure — the rhythms,
the rhyme scheme, etc. It's not really a first draft of the song
because you're not bothering with what the words "say"
yet, just with mapping out how the final lyric might be structured.
Many famous songs had such humble beginnings. Few songwriters haven't
heard of Paul McCartney's well-known dummy lyric for "Yesterday,"
which began, "Scrambled eggs..." (and continued with a less-well-known
second line having something to do with "like your legs").
Another example is Ira Gershwin's "I Got Rhythm" lyric.
The finished song goes, "I got rhythm/I got music/I got my man/Who
could ask for anything more?" But the dummy lyric went, "Roly-poly/eating
solely/ravioli/better watch your diet or bust!"
How you develop your dummy lyric into a finished lyric is entirely up
to you, and you can change it to reflect your evolving vision of the song.
For example, McCartney's final version of "Yesterday" followed
the rhyme scheme of his dummy lyric, but Gershwin decided to jettison
the insistent, rapid-fire rhymes in his dummy lyric in favor of a looser,
more open feel in the finished song.
Dummy lyrics are most suited to mapping a song's grosser lyrical
structures — the rhythms of the lines, the rhyme scheme, where
the hook appears, which elements are repeated and where, etc. It's
a useful model, but its uses are limited. Sometimes we encounter problems
that are best approached using a different kind of model.
One such problem is familiar to us all: you have a song that's well
on its way toward being completed, but there are certain passages where
you can't seem to get the right "ring" from the words.
They fit the melody and say what you want to say, and yet they still sound
wrong somehow. At times like this, I find it helpful to temporarily forget
about the meaning of the words and focus just on the sound. I dig down
into the phonetic structures of the words, into the very vowels and consonants
they're made out of, and create a model that captures the musical
character I want them to have. I call this model a "phonetic lyric."
With a phonetic lyric, I'm going for "singability," for
a combination of sounds that's enjoyable to sing and falls nicely
on the ear. And I'm also going for a subtle but no less important
fit between the melody and the vocal sounds that make up the lyrics. I
want the words to be as musical as the music itself.
Next time you find yourself banging your head on a passage in a song,
see if focusing on the sound of the words instead of the sense helps to
get you unstuck. Sing the melody to yourself, and see what vocal sounds
it inspires. Try different combinations of vowels and consonants and listen
for those that have a nice ring to them, that seem especially suited to
the melody, that seem somehow more "alive" to your ear. In this
exercise, pay more attention to how the words sound than to what they
say.
You may find yourself singing nonsense phrases and gibberish instead
of actual words. That's fine. In fact, it's a good thing, because
it means that you're letting go of preconceived notions and experiencing
your melody as pure sound and feeling. Let yourself be drawn naturally
to the sounds that feel good to sing and express the true nature of the
melody.
As your phonetic lyric becomes clearer, try using "real" words
and phrases that mimic it. For example, if your phonetic lyric has an
open "oh" sound somewhere, see if there are any oh-sounding
words that feel right in that spot. If there's a specific string
of syllables in your phonetic lyric, see if there are word combinations
containing that string. For example, if your phonetic lyric goes, "ee-no-wah,"
see what words contain those sounds — "we know why," "see no-one,"
etc. Later, you can see which of them are relevant
to your song. You can also try near matches ("in a while," "be
my wife," etc.).
When I use phonetic lyrics, I usually get very definite intuitive cues
as to what feels right. These cues are remarkably consistent for a given
song, and when I follow them closely, I almost always find my way to a
pleasing lyric. Of course, you want your song to say something meaningful
as well, and you have to strike a balance between the sound and the sense.
But I'm amazed at how often satisfying the one seems to satisfy the
other as well. It sometimes feels as though the song I'm writing
is already finished, and I'm just trying to listen closely enough
to hear what the words are. At other times, it's like I'm decrypting
a coded message, or translating the song from another language.
As a matter of fact, listening to songs sung in languages that you don;t
understand is an excellent way to strengthen your ear for musical phonetics.
Your right brain can enjoy all the beauty of the vocal sounds without
your left brain latching onto what they mean. Each language has its own
phonetic repertoire and characteristic sound, be it flowing or percussive,
velvety or brittle, barrel-chested or nasal. Ride the contours of the
singer's voice and follow the interplay of the phonetic themes and
variations, the calls and responses, the ebb and flow that make a lyric
sing well, that give each song its unique identity.
One of the reasons that writing phonetically can be so liberating is
that it focuses solely on the musical dimension of language. This can
shake up old habits that keep you from seeing the full range of alternatives
available to you as a songwriter. And it puts the sound before the sense
for a change, forcing the issue of singability, which many songwriters
overlook because they don't think of themselves as singers and don't
write from their voices.
Of course, writing phonetically isn't the only way to develop a
deeper feeling for the musicality of language. And it will be little help
to you if you don't have an equally developed ability to get your
point across. But these techniques do have their place, and they make
useful additions to your songwriter's toolbox. By treating words
and sounds as musical building blocks rather than "ideas," they
encourage playfulness, curiosity, and awareness — all of which come
in handy when you're feeling stuck. If you try these techniques,
let me know how they work for you. Happy songwriting!
Copyright 2001 by Richard Middleton.
All rights reserved.
Read More Articles:
»
Sorted by Topic
»
Sorted by Date
»
Inside Music page
»
Richard's Home Page
Richard Middleton is a songwriter, musician, teacher, and writer based in Seattle. He is the author of
"Reading Rhythm" (Countersine 2018).